Comparison · Updated September 13, 2026

Afterpay is the buy-now-pay-later network founded in Sydney in October 2014 by Nick Molnar and Anthony Eisen, and owned since January 2022 by Block, Inc. — the deal was announced in August 2021 at a headline US$29 billion and completed on far less, reported at roughly US$14 billion in Class A shares, because Block's own share price had fallen in the interim. For a merchant, the proposition is straightforward: offer shoppers four interest-free instalments over six weeks, or a monthly plan over six or twelve months, get paid up front rather than waiting for the customer to finish paying, and let Afterpay carry the fraud and non-payment risk. In exchange the merchant pays a commission Afterpay does not publish — third-party reviewers consistently report a range around 4% to 6% plus roughly $0.30 per transaction, several times the cost of taking the same sale on a card. Afterpay's own merchant marketing claims a 58% increase in average order value among accepting merchants and $8.6 billion of incremental US sales delivered over the preceding twelve months. Under Block, the product has increasingly become a Cash App feature rather than a standalone checkout button: Afterpay Post-Purchase and, from 2026, Afterpay Pre-Purchase let Cash App Card holders convert everyday card spend into instalments at any merchant, whether or not that merchant has ever signed an Afterpay agreement.

Zip is the US buy-now-pay-later network formerly known as Quadpay, owned by the ASX-listed Zip Co Limited. Zip Co was founded in Sydney in 2013 by Larry Diamond and Peter Gray and listed on the Australian Securities Exchange in 2015; the American business it now trades under is Quadpay, a New York company incorporated in August 2017 and bought by Zip in a deal announced in June 2020, approved by shareholders on 31 August 2020 and completed that September. For a merchant the offer is the familiar BNPL trade: let shoppers split a purchase into four instalments over six weeks, get paid up front, and hand the credit and non-payment risk to Zip. What separates Zip from the rest of the category is that it prints a price, and a settlement window to go with it. Its Standard plan is published on its own site at 5.9% plus 30 cents per transaction with no monthly or annual fee, where Afterpay, Klarna and most of the field quote nothing at all and negotiate every deal in private. It also publishes what most of the category will not: that it settles the merchant in full, minus its fees, within two to three business days, and where chargeback liability sits. That 5.9% is nonetheless the highest published headline rate in mainstream BNPL, and Zip's own FAQ confirms it is a floor rather than a ceiling. The parent is now solidly profitable — FY26, the year to 30 June 2026, brought A$16.7 billion of transaction volume, A$1.336 billion of revenue and A$116.4 million of statutory profit, with the US arm growing revenue more than 42% in local currency — but it has also exited Singapore, the United Kingdom and, in August 2026, New Zealand, and in May 2026 lost a unanimous High Court trade mark case in its home market — a loss it settled eight days later by acquiring the disputed mark from Firstmac, avoiding the rebrand the judgment otherwise required and taking on no further damages liability.
This is a US comparison. The Zip reviewed here is the American business formerly called Quadpay, and Afterpay's US price list and merchant terms are the ones compared. Both do the same job for a merchant: the shopper splits a purchase into instalments, the merchant is paid up front and the provider carries the credit and fraud risk on approved orders. The difference is what each will tell you before you sign. Zip publishes a Standard plan at 5.9% plus 30 cents per transaction, a settlement window of two to three business days and a chargeback policy with named exclusions, so a merchant can cost it without a sales call. Afterpay publishes no merchant rate, assigns each merchant a settlement period of one to five business days in its agreement, and leaves refund and reserve terms to the contract - but it is interest-free with no per-order fee for the shopper at partner brands, it is native to Block's Square and Cash App, and it serves five countries where Zip US serves one. Payment Review grades both B.
Afterpay suits a merchant already selling through Square or reaching Cash App users, a small-ticket discretionary retailer for whom a fee-free shopper experience matters, and anyone selling into Australia, New Zealand, the UK or Canada as well as the US.
Zip suits a US merchant that wants a costed, published BNPL offer with a known settlement window before committing, or that wants to trial BNPL through its existing card integration with no development work.
There is no single winner, and the tables show the split cleanly. Zip wins everything a merchant can check before signing: a published rate, a published settlement window, a published chargeback policy and support hours by plan. That makes it the one you can put in a spreadsheet today, and its Virtual Card Checkout makes it the one you can trial without a developer. Afterpay wins the things that decide whether shoppers actually use the button: Pay in 4 costs the shopper nothing at partner brands where Zip charges a per-order fee, it sits natively inside Square and Cash App, and it covers five countries under one brand. Neither publishes what happens to its commission on a refund, and neither publishes a reserve policy, so both need the same two questions answered in writing. Both carry a B from Payment Review, for opposite reasons - Zip for the price of its transparency, Afterpay for the absence of it.
| Feature | Afterpay | Zip |
|---|---|---|
| Published merchant rate | None; commission is quoted per merchant | Standard plan: starting at 5.9% + 30¢ per transaction Winner |
| Afterpay's US business page promises 'simple, transparent pricing' but prints no figure; its Australian merchant-fees page confirms the fee is a fixed amount plus a percentage set in the merchant agreement. Independent reviewers consistently report a range of roughly 4% to 6% plus about 30 cents for Afterpay, which is attributed reporting rather than a published price. Zip's own FAQ says alternative pricing is available for volume, unusual business models and add-on services, so 5.9% is a starting point. | ||
| Monthly, annual or setup fee | None published | None; the model is purely transactional |
| Afterpay's page describes free sign-up with no monthly fee. Zip's pricing FAQ states there are no monthly or annual fees. | ||
| Enterprise or volume pricing | Every agreement is negotiated | Custom plan with negotiated rates, account manager and 24/7 support |
| Zip's Custom plan is the tier above Standard and adds a dedicated account manager, SLA options and integration support. At Afterpay there is no published tier to move from, so the whole commercial deal is bespoke. | ||
| Payment Review pricing-transparency score | 1.5 out of 5 | 4 out of 5 Winner |
Recommendations based on your business type

Afterpay is native to Block's seller stack and to Cash App, so it is a setting rather than an integration, and its shoppers pay nothing extra at checkout. Zip would be a second integration with a per-order shopper fee.

Zip's 5.9% plus 30 cents, two-to-three-day settlement and published chargeback exclusions can be modelled today. Afterpay's commission, settlement period and dispute terms only arrive with the merchant agreement.

Zip's Virtual Card Checkout runs through the card integration you already have. Budget for your own processor's rate on top of Zip's commission, since the transaction arrives as a card payment.

Afterpay serves all five markets, trading as Clearpay in the UK. Zip US serves US purchases only, and its Australian parent is a separate business that has exited three markets since 2022.
Both fit the small-ticket discretionary category that BNPL was built for, and neither publishes how much commission comes back on a refund. Ask each for the refund clause and the reserve policy in writing and decide on those numbers, not the headline rate.
Neither. At Zip's published 5.9% plus 30 cents, or the similar range reported for Afterpay, either costs several times what the same sale costs on a card, and no conversion lift makes that viable on single-digit margins.
Common questions about this comparison
Explore more payment processor matchups