Payment Review
HomeReviewsCategoriesGet MatchedComparisonsBlogContact
Provider login
Payment Review

Your trusted source for payment industry insights, analysis, and expertise. Stay informed about the latest developments in payments technology and regulations.

Quick Links

  • Reviews
  • Comparisons
  • Blog
  • Request a Review
  • API Documentation
  • Provider Login

Contact

  • Contact Us
  • info@paymentreview.com

Follow Us

© 2026 Payment Review. All rights reserved.

Terms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Home
Comparisons
Afterpay vs Zip for US merchants

Comparison · Updated September 13, 2026

Afterpay vs Zip for US merchants

VS
Afterpay

Afterpay

B

Afterpay is the buy-now-pay-later network founded in Sydney in October 2014 by Nick Molnar and Anthony Eisen, and owned since January 2022 by Block, Inc. — the deal was announced in August 2021 at a headline US$29 billion and completed on far less, reported at roughly US$14 billion in Class A shares, because Block's own share price had fallen in the interim. For a merchant, the proposition is straightforward: offer shoppers four interest-free instalments over six weeks, or a monthly plan over six or twelve months, get paid up front rather than waiting for the customer to finish paying, and let Afterpay carry the fraud and non-payment risk. In exchange the merchant pays a commission Afterpay does not publish — third-party reviewers consistently report a range around 4% to 6% plus roughly $0.30 per transaction, several times the cost of taking the same sale on a card. Afterpay's own merchant marketing claims a 58% increase in average order value among accepting merchants and $8.6 billion of incremental US sales delivered over the preceding twelve months. Under Block, the product has increasingly become a Cash App feature rather than a standalone checkout button: Afterpay Post-Purchase and, from 2026, Afterpay Pre-Purchase let Cash App Card holders convert everyday card spend into instalments at any merchant, whether or not that merchant has ever signed an Afterpay agreement.

Read Full Review
Zip

Zip

B

Zip is the US buy-now-pay-later network formerly known as Quadpay, owned by the ASX-listed Zip Co Limited. Zip Co was founded in Sydney in 2013 by Larry Diamond and Peter Gray and listed on the Australian Securities Exchange in 2015; the American business it now trades under is Quadpay, a New York company incorporated in August 2017 and bought by Zip in a deal announced in June 2020, approved by shareholders on 31 August 2020 and completed that September. For a merchant the offer is the familiar BNPL trade: let shoppers split a purchase into four instalments over six weeks, get paid up front, and hand the credit and non-payment risk to Zip. What separates Zip from the rest of the category is that it prints a price, and a settlement window to go with it. Its Standard plan is published on its own site at 5.9% plus 30 cents per transaction with no monthly or annual fee, where Afterpay, Klarna and most of the field quote nothing at all and negotiate every deal in private. It also publishes what most of the category will not: that it settles the merchant in full, minus its fees, within two to three business days, and where chargeback liability sits. That 5.9% is nonetheless the highest published headline rate in mainstream BNPL, and Zip's own FAQ confirms it is a floor rather than a ceiling. The parent is now solidly profitable — FY26, the year to 30 June 2026, brought A$16.7 billion of transaction volume, A$1.336 billion of revenue and A$116.4 million of statutory profit, with the US arm growing revenue more than 42% in local currency — but it has also exited Singapore, the United Kingdom and, in August 2026, New Zealand, and in May 2026 lost a unanimous High Court trade mark case in its home market — a loss it settled eight days later by acquiring the disputed mark from Firstmac, avoiding the rebrand the judgment otherwise required and taking on no further damages liability.

Read Full Review
VS

Overview

This is a US comparison. The Zip reviewed here is the American business formerly called Quadpay, and Afterpay's US price list and merchant terms are the ones compared. Both do the same job for a merchant: the shopper splits a purchase into instalments, the merchant is paid up front and the provider carries the credit and fraud risk on approved orders. The difference is what each will tell you before you sign. Zip publishes a Standard plan at 5.9% plus 30 cents per transaction, a settlement window of two to three business days and a chargeback policy with named exclusions, so a merchant can cost it without a sales call. Afterpay publishes no merchant rate, assigns each merchant a settlement period of one to five business days in its agreement, and leaves refund and reserve terms to the contract - but it is interest-free with no per-order fee for the shopper at partner brands, it is native to Block's Square and Cash App, and it serves five countries where Zip US serves one. Payment Review grades both B.

Key Takeaways

  • ✓Zip publishes its merchant price - 5.9% plus 30 cents on the Standard plan - where Afterpay publishes none; third-party reporting puts Afterpay in a similar 4% to 6% plus about 30 cents range, negotiated per merchant.
  • ✓Zip publishes a settlement window of two to three business days; Afterpay assigns each merchant a period of one to five business days in its agreement, while its marketing says one to two.
  • ✓Afterpay is cheaper for the shopper: Pay in 4 is interest-free with no fees when paid on time at partner brands, whereas Zip charges the customer a per-order instalment fee shown at checkout.
  • ✓Afterpay is native to Square and Cash App, which a merchant already on Block's stack can switch on without a new integration; Zip's lowest-effort route is Virtual Card Checkout through the card integration you already have.
  • ✓Afterpay serves the US, Australia, New Zealand, the UK and Canada under one brand; Zip US serves US purchases only, and its Australian parent runs a separate business.

Afterpay

Afterpay suits a merchant already selling through Square or reaching Cash App users, a small-ticket discretionary retailer for whom a fee-free shopper experience matters, and anyone selling into Australia, New Zealand, the UK or Canada as well as the US.

Zip

Zip suits a US merchant that wants a costed, published BNPL offer with a known settlement window before committing, or that wants to trial BNPL through its existing card integration with no development work.

The Verdict

It Depends on Your Needs

Why?

There is no single winner, and the tables show the split cleanly. Zip wins everything a merchant can check before signing: a published rate, a published settlement window, a published chargeback policy and support hours by plan. That makes it the one you can put in a spreadsheet today, and its Virtual Card Checkout makes it the one you can trial without a developer. Afterpay wins the things that decide whether shoppers actually use the button: Pay in 4 costs the shopper nothing at partner brands where Zip charges a per-order fee, it sits natively inside Square and Cash App, and it covers five countries under one brand. Neither publishes what happens to its commission on a refund, and neither publishes a reserve policy, so both need the same two questions answered in writing. Both carry a B from Payment Review, for opposite reasons - Zip for the price of its transparency, Afterpay for the absence of it.

Feature by feature

Detailed Comparison

Filter Options

Merchant cost and transparency

Merchant cost and transparency: Afterpay compared with Zip.
FeatureAfterpayZip
Published merchant rate
None; commission is quoted per merchant
Standard plan: starting at 5.9% + 30¢ per transaction
Winner
Afterpay's US business page promises 'simple, transparent pricing' but prints no figure; its Australian merchant-fees page confirms the fee is a fixed amount plus a percentage set in the merchant agreement. Independent reviewers consistently report a range of roughly 4% to 6% plus about 30 cents for Afterpay, which is attributed reporting rather than a published price. Zip's own FAQ says alternative pricing is available for volume, unusual business models and add-on services, so 5.9% is a starting point.
Monthly, annual or setup fee
None published
None; the model is purely transactional
Afterpay's page describes free sign-up with no monthly fee. Zip's pricing FAQ states there are no monthly or annual fees.
Enterprise or volume pricing
Every agreement is negotiated
Custom plan with negotiated rates, account manager and 24/7 support
Zip's Custom plan is the tier above Standard and adds a dedicated account manager, SLA options and integration support. At Afterpay there is no published tier to move from, so the whole commercial deal is bespoke.
Payment Review pricing-transparency score
1.5 out of 5
4 out of 5
Winner

Published merchant rate

Afterpay
None; commission is quoted per merchant
Zip
Standard plan: starting at 5.9% + 30¢ per transaction
Winner
Afterpay's US business page promises 'simple, transparent pricing' but prints no figure; its Australian merchant-fees page confirms the fee is a fixed amount plus a percentage set in the merchant agreement. Independent reviewers consistently report a range of roughly 4% to 6% plus about 30 cents for Afterpay, which is attributed reporting rather than a published price. Zip's own FAQ says alternative pricing is available for volume, unusual business models and add-on services, so 5.9% is a starting point.

Monthly, annual or setup fee

Afterpay
None published
Zip
None; the model is purely transactional
Afterpay's page describes free sign-up with no monthly fee. Zip's pricing FAQ states there are no monthly or annual fees.

Enterprise or volume pricing

Afterpay
Every agreement is negotiated
Zip
Custom plan with negotiated rates, account manager and 24/7 support
Zip's Custom plan is the tier above Standard and adds a dedicated account manager, SLA options and integration support. At Afterpay there is no published tier to move from, so the whole commercial deal is bespoke.

Payment Review pricing-transparency score

Afterpay
1.5 out of 5
Zip
4 out of 5
Winner
Jump to:

Best For Your Business

Recommendations based on your business type

Retailer already taking payments with Square

Afterpay
Recommended
Afterpay
View the Afterpay review

Afterpay is native to Block's seller stack and to Cash App, so it is a setting rather than an integration, and its shoppers pay nothing extra at checkout. Zip would be a second integration with a per-order shopper fee.

Online store that wants a costed BNPL offer before committing

Zip
Recommended
Zip
View the Zip review

Zip's 5.9% plus 30 cents, two-to-three-day settlement and published chargeback exclusions can be modelled today. Afterpay's commission, settlement period and dispute terms only arrive with the merchant agreement.

Merchant that wants to trial BNPL with no development work

Zip
Recommended
Zip
View the Zip review

Zip's Virtual Card Checkout runs through the card integration you already have. Budget for your own processor's rate on top of Zip's commission, since the transaction arrives as a card payment.

Brand selling into Australia, New Zealand, the UK or Canada as well as the US

Afterpay
Recommended
Afterpay
View the Afterpay review

Afterpay serves all five markets, trading as Clearpay in the UK. Zip US serves US purchases only, and its Australian parent is a separate business that has exited three markets since 2022.

Fashion or beauty retailer with a high return rate

Both fit the small-ticket discretionary category that BNPL was built for, and neither publishes how much commission comes back on a refund. Ask each for the refund clause and the reserve policy in writing and decide on those numbers, not the headline rate.

Low-margin grocery, essentials or high-volume commodity seller

Neither. At Zip's published 5.9% plus 30 cents, or the similar range reported for Afterpay, either costs several times what the same sale costs on a card, and no conversion lift makes that viable on single-digit margins.

Afterpay: Best for 2 use cases
Zip: Best for 2 use cases

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about this comparison

Nobody can say from published prices, because Afterpay does not publish one. Zip's Standard plan is 5.9% plus 30 cents per transaction, with custom pricing for volume. Third-party reporting puts Afterpay's commission in a range of roughly 4% to 6% plus about 30 cents, negotiated per merchant, which overlaps Zip's published figure. Neither charges a monthly or setup fee. The honest comparison is Zip's printed price against the Afterpay quote you are actually given.

On published terms, Zip: it states it settles in full, minus fees, within two to three business days. Afterpay assigns each merchant a settlement period of between one and five business days in its agreement, with ACH adding a day or two, although its US marketing says one to two business days. Ask Afterpay for your assigned period before comparing.

They differ here. Afterpay's Pay in 4 is interest-free with no fees when paid on time at partner brands; late fees apply to missed payments, and Afterpay says a finance fee may apply to certain transactions, at an APR that could be 36% on loans issued by First Electronic Bank. Zip charges the shopper a per-order instalment fee that is shown at checkout and varies with the purchase amount, and a fee may apply for moving a payment date. For a merchant, a fee-free shopper experience usually converts better.

Both carry the credit and fraud risk on orders they approve, so a shopper who stops paying is the provider's problem, not yours. Both leave delivery disputes with the merchant: Zip's published policy excludes chargebacks arising from the merchant's conduct, the goods themselves, non-delivery, late delivery or transit damage, and Afterpay requires the merchant to evidence delivery on a non-delivery dispute within a stated window or refund the settlement and reimburse the chargeback fees.

Yes. Nothing on either's public pages requires exclusivity, both integrate with Shopify, BigCommerce, Magento, WooCommerce and Salesforce Commerce Cloud, and Zip can be added through Virtual Card Checkout without touching your back end. Many retailers offer more than one BNPL option; the cost is two agreements, two settlement schedules and two sets of refund terms to reconcile.

Afterpay is the larger network, but it no longer reports its own numbers: Block folds Afterpay into Cash App's reporting, and Afterpay's retailer page cites 10 million BNPL transacting active customers without stating the basis. Zip reports 6.5 million active customers and 97,400 merchants across the US and Australia-New Zealand for the year to June 2026, with the US the faster-growing half.

Related Comparisons

Explore more payment processor matchups

Affirm vs Afterpay

View comparison

Klarna vs Afterpay

View comparison
View All Comparisons