
One of the longest-running high-risk processors in the United States, operating since 1998 and built around subscription billing for adult, dating, streaming and creator platforms. It will underwrite what almost nobody else will — but it publishes no rates, and its contract terms deserve a careful read.

A South Florida high-risk biller founded in 2005, registered with Visa as an internet payment service provider and with Mastercard as a payment facilitator, serving adult, dating, subscription and content merchants across the US, EU, UK and Australia. It publishes its settlement terms in detail and its rates not at all.
Start with the thing both have in common: neither publishes a processing rate. CCBill sets out its pricing models — a flat-rate PSP offering with no monthly fee, or interchange-plus, tiered and discount-plus under its ISO offering — without attaching a single number to any of them. Segpay does not have a pricing page at all. So a comparison on price is impossible, and anyone quoting you 'CCBill charges X%' is guessing. What can be checked is everything underneath: which banks each is registered with, which regulators licence them, when they pay you, and how they handle your customers. On those, Segpay is the more disclosed of the two, and the more diversified — seven acquiring relationships against CCBill's concentrated pair, and a published payout day. CCBill is the older and larger platform, and the only one of the two that prints its high-risk registration costs.
CCBill is for merchants who want one all-in relationship with the oldest specialist in the segment — a master merchant account, consumer billing handled for them, and the option to graduate to their own merchant account on an ISO model later.
Segpay is for merchants who want the underlying arrangement visible: named acquiring banks across several institutions, published licences in three jurisdictions, a fixed weekly payout day, and settlement in the currency they choose.


Segpay wins on the only ground either of them lets you stand on. Since neither publishes a rate, the decision has to be made on structure, and Segpay discloses more of it and has more of it: seven named acquiring relationships across Woodforest, Merrick, BMO Harris, Humboldt, Worldline, Credorax and Rapyd against CCBill's Esquire Bank and Rapyd, licences in three jurisdictions rather than two, a published payout day and minimum, and a stated settlement currency choice. In a segment where the usual failure mode is an acquirer deciding it no longer wants your vertical, bank diversification is not a footnote — it is the product. CCBill's case is real but narrower: it is the older and bigger platform, it is the only one of the two that publishes its pricing models and the Visa and Mastercard registration fees you will pay either way, and its PSP offering gets a merchant live under a master account without arranging anything. The advice that applies to both is the same: nothing here substitutes for getting the rate, the reserve percentage and the reserve release schedule in writing before you sign, because neither company will tell you any of them in advance.
| Feature | CCBill | Segpay |
|---|---|---|
| Published processing rates | None | None |
| This is the honest headline of the comparison. Neither company publishes a discount rate, per-transaction fee or fee schedule anywhere on its site. Every rate you see quoted for either in third-party articles is unsourced, and both price per merchant during underwriting. | ||
| Published pricing models | Flat-rate PSP with 'no monthly fees'; ISO options of interchange-plus, tiered and discount-plus Winner | None; all terms are set during underwriting |
| CCBill at least tells you what shape the quote will take, and which model suits which business. That is not a price, but it is more than Segpay gives you before you apply. | ||
| Card-brand high-risk registration | Visa $950 a year; Mastercard $500 or $1,000 depending on region — published Winner | Not published |
| These are card-scheme fees paid to Visa and Mastercard by any high-risk merchant in an affected category, whoever processes for them. CCBill is unusual in printing them, and a merchant budgeting for either provider should assume they apply. | ||
| Monthly fee | 'No monthly fees' stated for the flat-rate PSP offering Winner | Not published |
Recommendations based on your business type
Both. This is the core competence of both, and the segment where each has spent decades keeping acquirers comfortable. Many operators of scale run both deliberately for redundancy, so that one acquirer exiting the vertical does not stop billing. Get quotes from each and compare the reserve terms as closely as the rate.

CCBill's PSP offering puts you under its master merchant account with the gateway, consumer support, onboarding and account management included, and states no monthly fees. That is the shortest path from application to first transaction.

Segpay names seven acquiring relationships across US and European institutions. More banks means more places to be moved to when one withdraws, which is the specific risk that ended your last account.

Segpay publishes a payout day — every Tuesday — a $125 minimum balance and a choice of USD, EUR or GBP settlement. CCBill publishes no payout schedule at all, so you would be planning cash flow against a term you can only learn during underwriting.

CCBill's ISO offering includes interchange-plus, which it describes as the lowest-cost model for high-volume businesses, and discount-plus for merchants with established processing history. Segpay publishes no models at all, so CCBill is the only one of the two you can approach knowing what to ask for.
Neither publishes one. If a comparison site quotes you a percentage for either company, it is not sourced from the company. Budget instead for the Visa $950 and Mastercard $500 to $1,000 annual high-risk registration fees, which apply in affected categories regardless of who processes for you, and treat the discount rate as something to be negotiated.
Common questions about this comparison