Comparison · Updated September 17, 2026

Polar (polar.sh) is an open-source merchant of record and billing platform for developers selling software, SaaS subscriptions and digital products. It is run by Polar Software, Inc., a Delaware corporation whose team is based in Stockholm, and was founded in 2022 by Birk Jernström, who co-founded the e-commerce platform Tictail, sold it to Shopify in 2018 and then led product for Shopify's Shop app. Polar launched version 1.0 of its billing platform in September 2024 and raised a $10 million seed round led by Accel in June 2025, with angels from Shopify, Vercel, Supabase, Raycast, Resend and Framer. As merchant of record it is the legal seller of everything sold through it — it collects and remits US sales tax, EU VAT, Canadian GST and other taxes, carries chargeback liability and issues the invoices — and it charges a single platform fee on top of that. That fee changed on 27 May 2026. Organisations created before that date keep an 'Early Member' rate of 4% + 40¢ plus 0.5% on subscriptions indefinitely; new organisations pay 5% + 50¢ on the free Starter plan or buy down the rate with Pro ($20 a month, 3.8% + 40¢), Growth ($100, 3.6% + 35¢) or Scale ($400, 3.4% + 30¢). International (non-US) cards add 1.5%, disputes cost $15 each regardless of outcome, payouts go through Stripe Connect at Stripe's pass-through fees ($2 per active payout month, 0.25% + 25¢ per payout), and organisations created on or after 12 May 2026 have a seven-day settlement delay before they can withdraw. Its code is Apache 2.0 on GitHub, its SDKs and framework adapters are widely praised, and its weak points are the ones you would expect of a seed-stage company two years into operating: thin support, fixed dunning you cannot customise, and pricing for newcomers that is now level with Paddle and Lemon Squeezy rather than below them.

Lemon Squeezy is a merchant-of-record platform for selling software, digital downloads, subscriptions and licence keys, launched publicly in 2021 by a small team of founders led by JR Farr and acquired by Stripe in July 2024. As merchant of record it is the legal seller of record on every transaction: it collects and remits sales tax and VAT worldwide, absorbs fraud and chargeback liability, and pays the merchant a net amount twice a month. The price is one number — 5% plus 50 cents per transaction, with no monthly fee — plus surcharges of 1.5% on international and PayPal transactions and 0.5% on subscription payments, and the tooling around it (checkout overlays, licence keys, signed download links, affiliates, email marketing) is unusually complete for the price. The catch is what has happened since the acquisition. Stripe has built its own merchant-of-record product, Stripe Managed Payments, priced at 3.5% on top of standard Stripe fees, and in January 2026 Lemon Squeezy's chief executive wrote that the team had been heads-down on it, that Lemon Squeezy users had seen slower support and fewer updates as a result, and that the goal was to give them an easy way to migrate. Independent sentiment has collapsed accordingly: 1.2 on Trustpilot from 173 reviews, 88% of them one-star, mostly about onboarding rejections and unanswered support requests. The product still works and still signs up new merchants, but a buyer today is choosing a platform whose own maker is steering customers to its successor.
Polar and Lemon Squeezy are both merchants of record for software and digital products: they are the legal seller on every sale, collect and remit VAT and sales tax worldwide, and pay the developer a net amount. They start at the same price — 5% + 50¢ per transaction — but diverge from there. Polar, an open-source Stockholm start-up graded B- on Payment Review, sells paid plans from $20 a month that cut the rate to 3.8%, 3.6% and 3.4%, charges no subscription surcharge on new accounts, and lets you withdraw whenever the balance passes $10. Lemon Squeezy, owned by Stripe since July 2024 and graded C+, has one rate plus 1.5% on international cards, 1.5% on PayPal and 0.5% on subscriptions, pays out on the 14th and 28th after a 13-day hold with a $50 minimum, and has spent 2026 building Stripe Managed Payments, the product it says it wants its users to migrate to. Polar is the better choice for a developer starting today; Lemon Squeezy's remaining case is a US seller who wants PayPal checkout and free US payouts and is content to move to Stripe's successor when it opens.
Polar is for a developer or SaaS founder who wants the lowest merchant-of-record rate once volume justifies a $20-plus monthly plan, control over when money is withdrawn, official SDKs in TypeScript, Python, Go and PHP, and an open-source platform whose roadmap is its own.
Lemon Squeezy is for a US-based seller of downloads or licence keys who wants PayPal at checkout and fee-free payouts to a US bank, is comfortable with twice-monthly payouts, and accepts that its owner is steering users to Stripe Managed Payments.


Polar. The two match at 5% + 50¢ on their free tiers, but Polar's paid plans are the only route either publishes to a lower rate, it adds no subscription surcharge on new accounts, its money is available on demand above $10 rather than twice a month above $50, and its SDKs cover more languages. Its weaknesses are real — a seven-day settlement delay on new accounts, Stripe payout fees, email-only support and a thin, unhappy Trustpilot record — but Lemon Squeezy shares the support and Trustpilot problems and adds the larger one: its owner is building its replacement and has said so. Payment Review grades Polar B- and Lemon Squeezy C+. Lemon Squeezy keeps a narrow edge for a US seller who needs PayPal at checkout and free payouts to a US bank.
| Feature | Polar | Lemon Squeezy |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan rate | 5% + $0.50 (Starter) | 5% + $0.50 |
| Both from the providers' fee pages as of September 2026, and both cover card processing, tax handling and currency conversion. Polar organisations created before 27 May 2026 keep a legacy 4% + 40¢ Early Member rate. | ||
| Paid plans | Pro $20/mo at 3.8% + $0.40; Growth $100/mo at 3.6% + $0.35; Scale $400/mo at 3.4% + $0.30 Winner | None; custom pricing for high volume |
| Polar's Pro plan pays for itself at about $1,700 of monthly sales (1.2% saved plus 10¢ a transaction). Lemon Squeezy's fee page says custom pricing is available for high-volume businesses but publishes no threshold or rate. | ||
| International card surcharge | +1.5% (non-US cards) | +1.5% (transactions outside the US) |
| Subscription surcharge | None on current plans (+0.5% for legacy Early Members only) Winner | +0.5% |
| PayPal | Not listed on Polar's fee page | +1.5% per transaction |
| Polar processes through Stripe and its fee page lists no PayPal option; Lemon Squeezy supports PayPal at checkout for a 1.5% uplift. | ||
| Dispute fee | $15, deducted from balance regardless of outcome | $15, deducted from the next payout with the refunded amount |
Recommendations based on your business type

Polar charges no subscription surcharge on current plans and its Pro plan at 3.8% + 40¢ beats Lemon Squeezy's 5.5% + 50¢ on subscriptions from the first month at any meaningful volume.

Both issue and validate licence keys, but Polar's SDKs in TypeScript, Python, Go and PHP and its framework adapters cover more stacks, and it is open source if you need to see how it works.

Lemon Squeezy offers PayPal at checkout for 1.5% and pays US bank accounts free; Polar processes through Stripe and its fee page lists no PayPal option.

Lemon Squeezy charges 1% on non-US payouts; Polar's 0.25% + 25¢ plus a 0.25% to 1% conversion is usually less, and its minimum payout is far lower.

Polar is a young, venture-backed company, which carries its own risk, but Lemon Squeezy's owner has launched a successor product and said it wants Lemon Squeezy's users to migrate to it.
Neither offers a phone line or an SLA. Polar targets a 24–48 hour weekday email response; Lemon Squeezy's help centre asks for 'a few business days' and its leadership has acknowledged slow support. Payment Review scores both poorly on support.
Common questions about this comparison
Explore more payment processor matchups