Comparison · Updated October 13, 2026

Mangopay is payment infrastructure for marketplaces and platforms rather than a processor a shop signs up with. It launched in 2013 as a spin-off of the French group-gifting site Leetchi, was bought by Crédit Mutuel Arkéa in 2015, and has been majority-owned by Advent International since April 2022, which put €75 million of new capital in at the same time; Sergi Herrero, previously global director for payments and commerce partnerships at Meta, has been chief executive since September 2024. Mangopay S.A. is registered in Luxembourg and licensed by the CSSF as an electronic money institution, which is the core of the product: it can open an e-wallet for every buyer and seller on a platform, hold funds there, split a payment between several parties, and pay out later — the money movement a marketplace legally cannot do itself without a licence of its own. Its UK arm, Mangopay U.K. Limited, has been an FCA-authorised electronic money institution since 2023, under firm reference 984753. The company says it has created 207 million wallets and processed €68 billion in transactions, and its named clients are the big European marketplaces: Vinted, Wallapop, Chrono24, Rakuten France, ManoMano, Malt, Mirakl. It bought the Polish anti-fraud firm Nethone in November 2022 and the Dublin payment orchestrator WhenThen in March 2023, and now sells fraud screening, identity verification, FX across twenty-plus wallet currencies, payouts in thirty-plus countries and virtual IBANs alongside the core wallet. What it does not do is publish prices: pricing is custom and volume-based, quoted per platform, with no self-serve tier and no public rate card.
Stripe is a leading payment processor known for its developer-friendly API, transparent pricing, and comprehensive suite of payment solutions for businesses of all sizes.
This compares the two as payment infrastructure for a marketplace or platform based in the eurozone, using what each published in October 2026, with Stripe's Ireland and France pricing (they are identical). Stripe wins for most marketplaces. Its rates are public: 1.5% + €0.25 for standard EEA cards, and on the Connect model where the platform sets its sellers' pricing, €2 per monthly active account plus 0.25% + €0.10 per payout. It supports more payment methods, offers 24/7 support and has the deeper developer tooling, and Stripe is available to businesses in 51 countries and regions. Mangopay publishes no rates for platforms: every contract is quoted by its sales team, there is no free tier or self-serve plan, and only platforms registered in the EEA or the UK can sign up. What Mangopay does better is hold money. It is an e-money institution licensed in Luxembourg that gives every user a wallet and lets a platform hold funds there with no fixed time limit, while Stripe says it does not provide escrow and requires funds held with manual payouts on an EEA connected account to be paid out within 90 days. A marketplace whose model depends on holding buyers' money for months, such as rentals booked far ahead, crowdfunding or milestone-based services, should get a Mangopay quote. Payment Review grades Stripe A and Mangopay B-.
Mangopay suits an established marketplace or platform registered in the EEA or the UK that needs to hold buyers' and sellers' money in wallets for long or open-ended periods, split it between several parties and pay out across Europe, and that is prepared to go through a sales process to learn the price.
Stripe suits most marketplaces and platforms, including early-stage ones, that want published pricing, quick self-serve onboarding for sellers, 100+ payment methods, round-the-clock support and strong developer tools, and that pay sellers out within 90 days of a sale.

For most European marketplaces Stripe Connect is the better choice, and that matches Payment Review's grades (Stripe A, Mangopay B-). Its rates are public, it charges no Connect fees if Stripe bills sellers directly or €2 per active account plus 0.25% + €0.10 per payout if the platform sets its sellers' pricing, it supports 100+ payment methods, offers 24/7 support and has the broader developer tooling, and Stripe is available to businesses in 51 countries and regions. Mangopay cannot be priced without a sales process and only signs platforms registered in the EEA or the UK. Its clear strength is holding money: wallets can hold funds with no fixed time limit under its Luxembourg e-money licence, while Stripe requires funds held on an EEA connected account to be paid out within 90 days and says it does not provide escrow. If your model needs that, get a Mangopay quote.
| Feature | Mangopay | Stripe |
|---|---|---|
| Public rate card | No; custom quote only | Yes Winner |
| Mangopay's pricing page says pricing is tailored to each platform by volume, the products activated (pay-in, wallets, FX, identity, fraud, payout) and the payment flows required, that higher volume means lower fees, and that it has no free tier or self-serve starter plan. Stripe publishes its card, payment-method, dispute and Connect fees and also offers custom pricing for large volumes. | ||
| Standard EEA consumer card, online | Not disclosed | 1.5% + €0.25 |
| Stripe's Ireland and France pricing pages both list 1.5% + €0.25 for standard EEA cards and 2.8% + €0.25 for premium EEA cards. Mangopay publishes no card rate. | ||
| International (non-EEA) card, online | Not disclosed | 3.15% + €0.25 |
| Stripe charges 2.5% + €0.25 on UK cards and 3.15% + €0.25 on other international cards, plus 2% if currency conversion is needed. | ||
| Marketplace fees on top of processing | Not disclosed | €2 per active account per month + 0.25% + €0.10 per payout |
| Stripe's figures apply when the platform handles pricing for its sellers (the model Stripe recommends for marketplaces): the platform pays Stripe's processing fees and charges sellers its own. An account is active in any month it receives a payout. If Stripe bills connected accounts for processing directly, there are no account, payout or onboarding fees for the platform. Under both models, Instant Payouts cost 1% of payout volume and cross-border payouts start at 0.25%. Mangopay's pricing page lists payout pricing that depends on country zones but publishes no figures. | ||
| Cost of paying one seller €1,000 in a month | Not disclosed | €4.60 (€2 account fee + €2.60 payout fee) |
| Stripe's Connect fees only, under the platform-handles-pricing model, for one €1,000 payout in a month; card processing on the underlying sales is charged separately. Mangopay's equivalent depends on the contract. | ||
| Setup or monthly fee | Not disclosed | None |
| Stripe's pricing page says there are no setup, monthly or hidden fees on standard pricing. Mangopay invoices its commission monthly, within five business days of the start of the month, and deducts it from the fees the platform has collected in its fees wallet; any shortfall is taken by direct debit. | ||
Recommendations based on your business type
Stripe's pricing is public (1.5% + €0.25 on standard EEA cards, and no Connect fees if Stripe bills sellers directly), onboarding is self-serve, and it has no setup or monthly fee. Mangopay has no self-serve plan and quotes every platform individually.

Mangopay's wallets set no fixed time limit on holding funds. With Stripe, funds held with manual payouts on an EEA connected account must be paid out within 90 days, and Stripe says it does not provide escrow.
Mangopay only works with platforms registered in the EEA or the UK. Stripe is available in 51 countries and regions, and EEA, UK, US, Canadian and Swiss platforms can pay sellers across those regions.
Both. Mangopay's prices fall as volume rises and Stripe offers custom pricing for large volumes, including interchange-plus for connected accounts. Neither publishes its negotiated rates, so get both quotes in writing and compare the total of processing, wallet, payout and verification fees.
Stripe lists 24/7 support by email, phone and chat. Mangopay offers enterprise support through its Dashboard but publishes no hours.
Common questions about this comparison
Explore more payment processor matchups