Credit card surcharging in 2026: what the networks and the states actually allow
Payment Review Editorial Team
Payment Review Editorial Team

Surcharging, adding a fee when a customer pays by credit card, has been allowed under Visa and Mastercard rules since 2013 and is legal in most states. It is also the area of merchant compliance where the guides on the web are most often wrong, because the rules come from three sources that change on different schedules: Visa, Mastercard, and the state where each of your locations sits. A guide written in 2023 will tell you Kansas and Oklahoma ban surcharging. Neither does now.
This article sets out what each rule-maker actually requires as of September 2026, working from the networks' own published rules and the state statutes rather than from other guides, then looks at how the processors we review implement it.
Visa's US merchant surcharge Q&A, version dated February 15, 2024, and its one-page requirements sheet, dated August 2023, set out the rules in plain terms. A merchant that intends to surcharge must notify its acquirer at least 30 days before starting; include the surcharge amount in a dedicated field in the transaction message, which the acquirer enables; limit surcharging to credit cards; limit the amount to the merchant discount rate for the card or 3%, whichever is lower; and disclose the surcharge at the point of entry, at the point of sale or online transaction, and on every receipt.
The 3% ceiling dates from April 15, 2023, when Visa cut it from 4%. The ceiling only matters if your cost of acceptance is above 3%; if you pay 2.4% to take Visa credit, 2.4% is your maximum surcharge. Visa says it enforces this with consumer complaints and annual mystery shopping by outside auditors, and that the acquirer of a merchant caught surcharging improperly faces an immediate $1,000 fine. A July 2023 alert from the law firm ArentFox Schiff describes a fine schedule that escalates to $150,000 at 150 days of non-compliance and $25,000 a month after that; that schedule is the firm's account, not something in Visa's public documents.
Two points in Visa's Q&A trip merchants up. A debit card run as "credit" is still a debit card: the choice on the terminal is between a PIN transaction and a signature transaction, not between card types, and it may not be surcharged. And a merchant may surcharge at brand level, the same fee on every Visa credit card, or at product level, a fee on particular products such as Visa Signature, but not both.
Visa also draws the line between a surcharge and a cash discount. A discount is permitted if you display only the card price per item, or the card and cash prices side by side. If the total shown at the till is reached by adding a fee for paying by card, Visa says it "may be treated as a surcharge" and subject to the surcharge rules, whatever you call it on the sign.
Mastercard's merchant surcharge FAQ adds two obligations on top of Visa's. A merchant must give both Mastercard and its acquirer a minimum of 30 days' written notice, and the acquirer must register the merchant with Mastercard within 10 days. Notice to Mastercard is given through its merchant site and acknowledged by an automated reply; the merchant may start 30 days after that reply.
The cap is described as the merchant's average merchant discount rate for Mastercard credit, calculated over the preceding one or twelve months at the merchant's option, with an absolute ceiling of 4% that Mastercard says "only becomes relevant in the rare instances where a merchant is paying more than 4%." That FAQ is dated May 2019 and predates Visa's move to 3%. In practice the point is moot: every processor product we examined applies a 3% ceiling to all brands, and a merchant surcharging at brand level pays roughly the same for both networks. Mastercard's disclosure rule also requires the sign to state that the surcharge is not greater than the merchant's cost of acceptance.
Mastercard's FAQ is also the clearest statement of the American Express problem. If you accept a competing brand that permits surcharging but requires you to surcharge all brands equally, and that brand costs you the same or more than Mastercard, you may surcharge Mastercard only if you also surcharge that brand. American Express's merchant policy is a non-discrimination policy of exactly that kind, which is why merchants that take Amex have generally been unable to surcharge Visa and Mastercard alone. The pending Visa and Mastercard settlement would remove that link on the networks' side; it has preliminary court approval and is not yet in effect.
Three state statutes prohibit surcharging today, and their wording differs in ways that matter.
Visa's Q&A also lists Puerto Rico as prohibiting surcharges, and the processors that exclude jurisdictions from their surcharging products exclude the same four: Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts and Puerto Rico.
Three states have statutes that say surcharging is illegal, and federal courts have said those statutes cannot be enforced, at least against the merchants who challenged them. This is the part most guides get wrong in one direction or the other.
Processors treat these three as "restricted" rather than banned, and their products generally allow surcharging there. The legal position is that the statutes are unenforceable on First Amendment grounds, but nobody has repealed them. If you operate in one of these states and the amounts are material, that is a question for counsel, not a blog.
The state rules moved three times in eighteen months, and vendor documentation lags. Visa's own Q&A, dated February 2024, lists Oklahoma as a prohibiting state; that was true until November 2025. Square's help centre lists Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts and Puerto Rico as prohibited and seven others as restricted, which is current. Nadapayments, a surcharging specialist, still lists Colorado among the states that do not permit surcharges on its blog, which has been wrong since July 2022; our review notes the contradictory state information on its site. Check the date on anything you read, including this article, and check the statute if the answer matters.
The mechanics vary more than the marketing suggests. In particular, watch whether the product decides the rate for you, whether it excludes debit automatically, which channels it covers, and what you still pay.
Square offers credit card surcharges in the US as an open beta. It works on the Point of Sale, Restaurant and Retail apps and on web invoices, and not on Appointments, Kiosk, Connected Terminal, Virtual Terminal or Square Online. The surcharge is capped at 3%, applies to credit only, and is not applied to ACH, debit, tips, offline or split-tender payments. Receipts carry a notice.
Toast's Credit Card Surcharging product is the most explicit about the arithmetic. It excludes merchants in Connecticut, Maine and Massachusetts and those with a direct American Express agreement, detects debit and prepaid cards automatically, applies the surcharge to the pre-tax, pre-tip amount, caps it at 3% (2% in Oklahoma) and suggests a location-specific "compliant rate" based on your estimated processing cost. It also says plainly that you remain responsible for your full processing rate on the gross amount, surcharge included. On Toast's published 2.49% + $0.15 in-person rate, a $100 sale with a 2.49% surcharge is processed at $102.49, and you pay processing on $102.49.
Stripe exposes surcharging through its API rather than a switch, and as of its current documentation the feature is in public preview on a preview API version. Stripe validates that the surcharge does not exceed a technical maximum, which is 3% for US credit cards, but leaves the merchant to calculate a compliant amount, to notify the acquirer or network, to disclose the fee before purchase, to show it separately on the receipt, and to refund it pro rata on a partial refund. The documentation says, in a highlighted note, that you are fully responsible for fines arising from non-compliance.
Helcim calls its product Fee Saver. It is optional, defaults to a 3% pass-on fee for US credit transactions, adds 0.5% for American Express and 1.5% for international cards online, and does not apply to debit, ACH, bank withdrawal, cash or cheque; Helcim requires that you accept one of those non-card methods by default, which is what keeps the fee avoidable. Two details from its help centre are worth knowing. The in-person product is not offered in Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, Colorado or Oklahoma, which is a conservative reading of the 2% caps in the last two. And the online fee is labelled a "convenience fee" on the receipt while the in-person fee is labelled a "surcharge"; Mastercard's rules reserve convenience fees for pre-certified government and education merchants, so ask Helcim how that is handled before relying on it. Our Helcim review's rates, interchange plus 0.4% and $0.08 in person, are what you pay on the debit and card volume the fee does not cover.
Stax sells surcharging through CardX, which it owns. It caps the fee at 3%, detects debit cards and applies no fee to them, processes the surcharge and the sale as one transaction, and itemises the surcharge on the receipt. Stax's page does not publish pricing for the product. PayJunction applies a 3% maximum, lets a merchant set a lower rate, excludes branded debit cards whether PIN or signature, and enables surcharging per location so a multi-state business can switch it off where the law requires. Clover's developer documentation describes surcharging as something a merchant configures through its Clover account or a plugin, with a notice to the customer at checkout. Because Clover is sold through banks and resellers, the rate and the handling of state restrictions are set in the reseller agreement, which our Clover review says to obtain in full rather than as a summary sheet.
Nadapayments is built around surcharging rather than offering it as a feature. Per our review, the customer pays a 3.00% surcharge on credit, the merchant pays nothing on those transactions and 1.50% + 25¢ on debit, with a $35 monthly terminal rental. The company's own blog describes a cap of 4% and a different list of excluded states from its product pages, which is one reason the review grades it B-.
A surcharge programme does not usually take your card cost to zero, and the reasons are worth knowing before you sign.
None of that makes surcharging a bad idea. For a high-ticket, card-heavy business such as a dental practice or an auto repair shop, it is often the single largest cost reduction available. It is a reason to run the numbers on your own statement, with your own debit share and your own state, rather than on the example in the brochure.