
A sales organisation with an unusually good promise and an unusually poor paper trail. Leap Payments sells interchange-plus pricing to every customer and attaches a Lifetime Rate Lock: its own processing, authorization and monthly account fees will not rise for the life of the account, with interchange itself passing through at cost in both directions. That is a better structure than most small merchants are offered, and the company has real standing behind it — it was named the number one MSP/ISO in Elavon's Western Region for merchant activations at Elavon's 2019 conference. The trouble is that you cannot verify anything else. No rate, no markup, no monthly fee and no contract term is published. Sources disagree on whether the agreement is month-to-month with no early termination fee or a three-year term with a $295 exit fee. Its own site says it is a sales office for WorldPay, an FIS Global company — a description stale on two counts by 2026 — while independent reviewers describe it as a registered ISO and MSP of Elavon. And the Better Business Bureau, which the company's marketing history leans on, currently shows no rating at all.
Tell them what you need. This goes to Leap Payments only.
Small and mid-sized merchants who want interchange-plus rather than tiered pricing, are willing to insist on a written fee schedule and contract term before signing, and value a locked markup over a low introductory rate.
The offer is good and the disclosure is not, and how much that matters depends entirely on how carefully you read. Interchange-plus for every customer is the pricing structure a small merchant should want, and a genuine lifetime lock on the processor's own markup is better than the industry norm of a rate that drifts upward annually. The support record is decent — praise for service and rates outnumbers criticism across independent reviews, and the BBB shows only three complaints in three years, all resolved. But nothing is published: not the markup, not the monthly fee, not the PCI fee, not the term. Worse, credible sources contradict each other on the fundamentals — month-to-month with no exit fee versus a three-year term with $295 to leave — and at least one merchant complaint says the term and fee were not properly explained. The company's own about page still describes it as a sales office for WorldPay, an FIS Global company, which has been wrong on two counts since Global Payments completed its Worldpay acquisition in January 2026, while independent reviewers call it an Elavon ISO/MSP. Ask for the agreement, read the term and the fee schedule, and only then decide. On those terms it can be a good deal.
Need to compare published rates before taking a call, cannot get a written term and termination clause out of a salesperson, or want a single provider whose backing processor and contract structure are documented publicly.
The headline take, the audiences it's right (and wrong) for, and the genuine differentiators behind the verdict.
A sales organisation with an unusually good promise and an unusually poor paper trail. Leap Payments sells interchange-plus pricing to every customer and attaches a Lifetime Rate Lock: its own processing, authorization and monthly account fees will not rise for the life of the account, with interchange itself passing through at cost in both directions. That is a better structure than most small merchants are offered, and the company has real standing behind it — it was named the number one MSP/ISO in Elavon's Western Region for merchant activations at Elavon's 2019 conference. The trouble is that you cannot verify anything else. No rate, no markup, no monthly fee and no contract term is published. Sources disagree on whether the agreement is month-to-month with no early termination fee or a three-year term with a $295 exit fee. Its own site says it is a sales office for WorldPay, an FIS Global company — a description stale on two counts by 2026 — while independent reviewers describe it as a registered ISO and MSP of Elavon. And the Better Business Bureau, which the company's marketing history leans on, currently shows no rating at all.
Real-world cost at three volumes, plus the rates, fees, payouts, and contract terms that drive them.
Estimated annual cost at three realistic processing volumes, using Leap Payments’s published online rate plus monthly fees. Real costs vary with average transaction size, chargeback rate, and any negotiated terms.
Leap Payments is a sales organisation rather than a processor — it places merchant accounts with an acquiring bank and services the relationship — and its pitch is unusually sensible for that segment. Every customer gets interchange-plus pricing, meaning the card networks' own cost is passed through at cost and the processor's markup sits visibly on top. On top of that sits the Lifetime Rate Lock: Leap's processing fees, authorization fees and monthly account maintenance are locked for the life of the account, guaranteed.
That combination is genuinely better than the norm for a small merchant. The standard pattern in this market is a competitive opening quote on tiered pricing followed by markup that drifts upward each year, discoverable only by someone who reads their statement closely enough to catch it. A locked markup on interchange-plus removes both halves of that problem, at least in principle.
Interchange is the same wherever you buy. Visa and Mastercard set it, everybody pays it, and no processor can discount it. Which means that on interchange-plus pricing, the plus is the entire competitive question — and Leap Payments does not publish it. Not on the pricing methods page, not on the rate lock page, not anywhere. Every route ends at a form.
The fixed fees are no clearer, and here the sources actively conflict. Leap advertises no startup fees, no statement fees and no compliance fees. One independent review reports the same, and adds next-day funding at $9.95 or less depending on volume. Another reports a $10 monthly fee and a $59 PCI compliance fee — which cannot both be true alongside 'no compliance fees'. None of it can be checked against a document, because Leap publishes none.
On the single most consequential term — how long you are committed and what leaving costs — credible sources disagree outright. Some independent reviews describe month-to-month service with no contract and no early termination fee. Another reports a $295 early termination fee. A merchant complaint on record describes a three-year term and an exit fee that were not properly explained at signing.
We are not going to resolve that by picking the friendliest version. The most likely explanation is that terms vary by deal and by sales channel, which is common in ISO distribution and is precisely why a verbal 'no contract' is worth nothing. There is a suggestive detail too: Leap Payments offers to buy out the early termination fee charged by an incumbent provider for merchants processing over $10,000 a month. A company that markets ETF buyouts is operating in a market where exit fees are normal.
The practical instruction is simple and non-negotiable. Ask for the merchant agreement before you sign it. Find the term clause and the termination clause. Read them. Keep a copy. If a salesperson cannot produce the document, that is your answer.
Leap Payments' own about page states that it is a sales office for WorldPay, an FIS Global company. By 2026 that sentence is wrong in two ways: FIS sold its majority stake in Worldpay to GTCR in 2024, and Global Payments completed its acquisition of Worldpay on 12 January 2026. Worldpay is not an FIS company.
Independent reviewers, meanwhile, describe Leap Payments as a registered ISO and MSP of Elavon, using Elavon's round-the-clock support, and the company's own Elavon support page calls it a premium provider of Elavon services — on the same page that repeats the WorldPay line. In a March 2020 press release Leap describes a ten-year Elavon partnership, says it was named number one MSP/ISO in Elavon's Western Region for merchant activations at Elavon's 2019 conference, and says it has processed billions of dollars through Elavon and US Bank. An ISO can legitimately hold more than one acquiring relationship and route merchants accordingly. But since the sponsoring bank decides on reserves, holds and terminations, you need to know which one holds yours.
That same 2020 release is worth knowing about for a second reason. It was issued to publicise a dispute: Leap says Elavon demanded $391,800 from it in November 2019 for ordinary merchant losses, that Elavon claimed Leap had failed to verify sales representatives' identities, that the representatives were listed on every merchant application, and that its MSP agreement expressly did not make it liable for underwriting, chargeback management or loss prevention. Leap took the matter to arbitration in Georgia. This is Leap's account of its own dispute and we have not seen Elavon's, so read it as one side of a story. What it tells a prospective merchant is narrow but real: the relationship between this ISO and its acquirer has been contested, and where liability for losses on your account sits is a question worth asking rather than assuming.
It is better than the disclosure problems might lead you to expect. The Better Business Bureau shows three complaints closed in three years, only one in the last twelve months, concerning charges continuing after cancellation and contract terms not adequately explained — all recorded as resolved with BBB assistance. Independent reviews carry more praise than criticism, especially for customer service and for the rates themselves once merchants are on them.
Two caveats. The BBB currently shows no rating and no accreditation, saying it has insufficient information to issue one, which conflicts with the A or A+ rating cited in the company's marketing history and by one independent reviewer. And the recurring service criticism is fee accumulation — merchants describing being nickel-and-dimed by monthly and per-feature charges across a broad catalogue of add-ons. On interchange-plus pricing, that is exactly the mechanism by which a low headline markup gets recovered.
There is a good deal available here for a small or mid-sized merchant who wants interchange-plus and a markup that stays put. The Lifetime Rate Lock is a real commitment, the interchange decreases genuinely pass back, and the support reputation is sound. The company has enough standing with Elavon to have won its regional activation award.
But the burden of verification sits entirely on you. Get the markup in basis points plus cents. Get a complete written fee schedule, including monthly, PCI, statement and funding fees. Get the agreement, read the term and termination clauses, and keep the copy. Ask which acquiring bank sponsors the account. Confirm whether you are being sold same-day or next-day funding, what the cut-off is, and what it costs. Do all of that and Leap Payments is a reasonable choice. Skip any of it and you are relying on a promise you have not seen written down.
Card-not-present, e-commerce, and online payments
Card-present retail and point-of-sale transactions
Recurring monthly account fee
Annual PCI DSS compliance and security fee
Fee for canceling before contract end
Regular deposit schedule to your bank account
Faster deposit option (may have additional fees)
This provider offers month-to-month terms with no long-term commitment.
Unresolved, and you should treat that as a red flag until you have the paperwork. Leap Payments publishes no standard merchant agreement and states no term on its site. Independent reviews split: some describe month-to-month service with no contract, another reports a three-year term. A merchant complaint on file describes a three-year term and early termination fee that were not properly explained at signing. Since the same company cannot be both, the only safe assumption is that terms vary by deal — which means the term you get is the term you negotiate and read.
Required commitment period
Not published. Complaints on the Better Business Bureau file include charges continuing after cancellation, alongside inadequate explanation of contract terms; the BBB records those complaints as resolved with its assistance. Cancel in writing, keep proof of delivery, and check the following statements.
How to terminate your account
Estimate your monthly costs
Pick a published plan, enter your volume and transaction profile, and we’ll compute the math the same way an underwriter would. Real costs vary with card mix, chargeback rate, and any negotiated terms.
Flat all-in rate (interchange built in)
Products, integrations, payment-type coverage, security posture, and how their support holds up in practice.
Card acceptance for retail, e-commerce and phone orders, priced interchange-plus for all customers, with the markup quoted individually. The Lifetime Rate Lock applies to Leap's own fees rather than to interchange.
The company's central promise: its processing fees, authorization fees and monthly account maintenance are locked for the life of the account, guaranteed. The stated exclusion is that the programme can be discontinued if matters outside Leap's control make it nonviable, and interchange changes always pass through at cost — down as well as up.
A dedicated high-risk arm covering CBD, firearms and ammunition, vaping, supplements, escort services, payday loans, online gaming and, by the company's own count, more than forty further categories. Pricing and underwriting for these are separate from the mainstream offer and are not published.
Counter-top and mobile card acceptance plus a virtual terminal for keyed and telephone orders. Reviewers describe a wide catalogue of features billed as separate monthly line items, which is the origin of the recurring complaint about being nickel-and-dimed.
Supporting products around the merchant account: invoice-and-pay links, electronic check acceptance, and gift card and loyalty programmes. Each carries its own pricing, none of it published.
For qualified merchants processing more than $10,000 a month, Leap Payments offers to buy out the early termination fee charged by an incumbent provider. Useful if you are trapped elsewhere — and worth reading as a statement about how common exit fees are in this segment.
Synthesis of third-party platform reviews and industry ratings — agreements, disagreements, and which signals to weight.
Based on 0 reviews across 1 rating platform
Currently unrated and not accredited — the BBB states it has insufficient information to issue a rating — despite the company's marketing history and one independent review citing an A or A+ rating with accreditation since 2009. The complaint record itself is light: three complaints closed in three years, one in the past twelve months, covering charges after cancellation and contract terms not adequately explained, all recorded as resolved with BBB assistance. Profile address 5115 Clareton Dr #150, Agoura Hills, CA; business recorded as started 1 May 2005.
Leap Payments publishes no rates at all, which is the central weakness of an otherwise sensible offer. What it does commit to is a structure: interchange-plus pricing for every customer, with interchange set by Visa, Mastercard and Discover and passed through at cost, so the only variable is Leap's own markup. That markup is never stated. Because interchange is identical no matter who you buy from, the markup is the entire competitive question, and comparing quotes means comparing exactly that number — ask for it expressed as basis points plus cents per transaction, in writing. On the fixed fees, the picture is contested. Leap advertises no startup fees, no statement fees and no compliance fees; one independent review agrees and adds next-day funding at $9.95 or less by volume; another reports a $10 monthly fee and a $59 PCI compliance fee. Insist on a complete written fee schedule before you sign anything.
We evaluate every payment processor independently — Payment Review does not accept paid placement. Our analysis combines hands-on product testing where possible, public pricing and policy documents, third-party reviews from BBB, Trustpilot, Google, and G2, and employee feedback from sites like Glassdoor and Indeed. We update reviews on a rolling cadence and flag the next review date so readers know how fresh the analysis is.
Suggest a correction. Our editorial team reviews every submission and updates reviews on a rolling cadence.
Claim this listing with an email at your own domain to file corrections and track them. Claiming does not let you change the grade, the verdict or the ratings.
No merchant has reviewed Leap Payments here yet. Be the first to share your experience.